Formalisation of the Informal: Can Vertical Community Spaces Enable Equitable High-Density Slum Upgrades in Bangkok?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2025.v9n1-11Keywords:
Vertical community spaces, Slum upgrading, High-density housing, Informal settlements, Urban resilienceAbstract
By 2050, nearly 68% of the global population will reside in urban areas, while 1.6 billion people already inhabit informal settlements lacking tenure security, basic services, and public space. This study explores whether vertically integrated community spaces can enable medium- to high-rise slum upgrading in Bangkok, where land scarcity constrains conventional low-rise approaches. A research-by-design methodology, conducted through a postgraduate studio in collaboration with a local community, informs the investigation. Spatial analysis, mapping, and participatory processes guided the development of modular walk-up block proposals, featuring stacked semi-public ‘streets-in-the-sky’ and compact communal spaces. These configurations offer vertical social interaction zones, economic potential via shophouses above ground level, and environmental benefits through enhanced daylight penetration and cross ventilation. Findings indicate an improved sense of belonging, social cohesion, and place identity despite vertical displacement. Vertically shared spaces demonstrate capacity to align high-density urban forms with evolving informal practices, providing a replicable, climate-responsive model for inclusive regeneration in rapidly urbanising contexts across the Global South.
Downloads
References
AlSayyad, N., & Roy, A. (Eds.). (2003). Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (2nd ed.). Lexington Books.
ASEAN Secretariat. (2022). ASEAN sustainable urbanisation report.
Asian Development Bank. (2011). Urbanization in Asia: Clean, green and competitive cities key to Asia’s future.
Boanada-Fuchs, A., Kuffer, M., & Samper, J. (2024). A Global Estimate of the Size and Location of Informal Settlements. Urban Science, 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010018
Boonyabancha, S. (2006, December). How upgrading of Thailand’s informal settlements is spear-heading a community-driven, city-wide, integrated social development process. Paper presented at the Arusha Conference: New Frontiers of Social Policy, Arusha, Tanzania.
Chantanusornsiri, W. (2025, 24 January). Keen interest in ‘Houses for Thais’ project. Bangkok Post.
Community Organizations Development Institute. (2005). Baan Mankong: An update on city-wide upgrading in Thailand. Author.
Cunha Borges, J., & Marat-Mendes, T. (2019). Walking on streets-in-the-sky: Structures for democratic cities. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 11(1), Article 1596520. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2019.1596520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2019.1596520
Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. New York: Verso. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2006.00797.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2006.00797.x
García-Villalba, O.C. (2015). The form behind the informal: Spatial patterns and street-based upgrading in revitalising informal and low-income areas. In H. C. Kiang, O. C. García-Villalba, & Y. Zhang (Eds.), Asian urban places: Great Asian Streets Symposium (GASS) 2014 (pp. 167–181). National University of Singapore.
Goldfinch, S. (2015). Property rights and the mystery of capital: A review of de Soto’s simplistic solution to development. Progress in Development Studies, 15(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414546971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414546971
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17415349.2008.11013714
Kamalipour, H. (2016). Urban morphologies in informal settlements: A case study. Contour Journal, 1(2), 61–71.
Kamalipour, H., & Peimani, N. (2020). Informal urbanism in the state of uncertainty: Forms of informality and urban health emergencies. Urban Design International, 26(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00145-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00145-3
King, L. A. (2018). Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. In S. M. Meagher, S. Noll, & J. S. Biehl (Eds.), Routledge handbook of philosophy of the city (pp. 76–86). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681597-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681597-7
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans. & Eds.). Blackwell Publishers.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
Philip, J. (2018). Why is the coexistence of formal and informal important? In I. Kucina (Ed.), Architectures of informality (pp. 82–86). DIA Graduate School, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.
Ren, H., Guo, W., Zhang, Z., Kisovi, L. M., & Das, P. (2020). Population Density and Spatial Patterns of Informal Settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Sustainability, 12(18), 7717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187717
Rigon, A. (2022). Diversity, justice and slum upgrading: An intersectional approach to urban development. Habitat International, 130, 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102691
Roy, A. (2012). Urban informality: The production of space and practice of planning. In R. Crane & R. Weber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban planning (pp. 691–705). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374995.013.0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374995.013.0033
Saiz, A. (2023). The global housing affordability crisis: Policy options and strategies (IZA Policy Paper No. 203). IZA – Institute of Labour Economics. https://docs.iza.org/pp203.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4402329
Shelby, H. (2017). The right to remain in the city: How one community has used legal rights and rights talk to stay put in Bangkok. Berkeley Planning Journal, 29(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.5070/BP329138438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/BP329138438
Sheng, Y. K., & Leeruttanawisut, K. (2016). Informal settlements in Bangkok: Origins, features, growth and prospects. In F. Anders & A. Sedlmaier (Eds.), Public goods versus economic interests: Global perspectives on the history of squatting (pp. 211–234). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652504-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652504-12
Suhartini, N., & Jones, P. (2023). Beyond the informal—Better understanding self-organisation and the self-organised city. In N. Suhartini & P. Jones (Eds.), Beyond the informal: Understanding self-organised kampungs in Indonesia (pp. 137–161). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22239-9_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22239-9_8
Sweeting, D. (2017). The informal city and rights in South-East Asian cities: The cases of the Kampung Improvement Programme and Baan Mankong (DPU Working Paper No. 192). University College London, Development Planning Unit.
Thai, H. M. H., Stevens, Q., & Rogers, J. (2022). The evolution of pathways linking main streets and marketplaces to home-based business locations in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 15(2), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1858444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1858444
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019). World urbanisation prospects 2018: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/421). United Nations.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2013). World economic and social survey 2013: Sustainable development challenges. United Nations.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). World social report 2020: Inequality in a rapidly changing world. United Nations.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2012). Streets as tools for urban transformation in slums: A street-led approach to citywide slum upgrading. UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/streets-as-tools-for-urban-transformation-in-slums
United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2014, 7 October). Edgar Pieterse – How can we transcend slum urbanism in Africa? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quhfgiZBfeAafricancentreforcities.net
United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2016). The New Urban Agenda. UN-Habitat.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanisation. UN-Habitat.
Usavagovitwong, N. (2012). Successful approaches to national slum upgrading and prevention: Thailand. World Bank Institute. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28047.30886
Usavagovitwong, N., Pruksuriya, A-O., Supaporn, W., Rak-u, C., Archer, D., & McGranahan, G. (2013). Housing density and housing preference in Bangkok’s low-income settlements. International Institute for Environment and Development.
Visagie, J., & Turok, I. (2020). Getting urban density to work in informal settlements in Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 32(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820907808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820907808
Yap, K. S., & De Wandeler, K. (2010). Self-help housing in Bangkok. Habitat International, 34(3), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.006
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adrian Lo, Toan Le Phuc
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
