From Connectivity to Liveability: Enhancing Urban Waterbody Accessibility through Space Syntax in Dhaka

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2025.v9n2-3

Keywords:

Space syntax, Public Open Space, Urban Waterbodies, Dhaka City, Spatial Integration, Accessibility

Abstract

Urban waterbodies play a vital role in enhancing ecological sustainability, social interaction, and neighbourhood liveability, yet in rapidly urbanising contexts such as Dhaka, they are increasingly threatened by encroachment, pollution, and reduced accessibility. This study investigates the accessibility and spatial integration of two significant urban waterbodies (Dholaikhal Narinda Pond and Shahjahanpur Jheel) under the Dhaka City Neighbourhood Upgrading Project (DCNUP), which seeks to revitalise public open spaces for disadvantaged communities. Using Space Syntax analysis, the research assesses spatial configuration through measures of Connectivity (CN), Global Integration (Rn), and Local Integration (R4) to evaluate accessibility at city and neighbourhood scales. Results indicate that Dholaikhal Narinda Pond demonstrates higher connectivity and global integration values, positioning it as a potential city-scale destination capable of enhancing urban inclusivity. By contrast, Shahjahanpur Jheel, though limited in city-wide accessibility, exhibits strong local integration, highlighting its potential as a neighbourhood-scale public space. These findings underscore the importance of aligning spatial analysis with urban design strategies to enhance accessibility and maximise social benefits. The study concludes that integrating syntactic measures into early project planning can help policymakers and urban designers anticipate patterns of use and achieve more equitable and sustainable revitalisation of public waterbodies in Dhaka.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam, I., Nur, S. M. S., & Mitra, C. (2025). Accessibility to Public Open Space of a densely populated city: a case study of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Computational Urban Science, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-025-00187-9

Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003

Coombes, E., Jones, A. P., & Hillsdon, M. (2010). The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social Science & Medicine, 70(6), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.020

Das, B., & Islam, I. (2010). Analyzing the Proposals of FAP 8B Project of Dhaka and Present Context of Retention Pond Areas and Canals. Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners, 3(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbip.v3i1.76866

Francis, M. (2003). Urban open space: Designing for user needs. Washington, DC: Island Press in cooperation with the Landscape Architecture Foundation.

Gehl, Jan. (2012). Life Between Buildings. Island Press.

Hanson, J. M. (1989). Order and structure in urban space: A morphological history of the City of London (Doctoral dissertation, University College London). University of London.

Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029

Ho, D. C., Lai, L. W., & Wang, A. (2021). The effects of ‘publicness’ and quality of publicly accessible open space upon user satisfaction. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320903733

Hossain, S. T., Al-Ramadan, B., Bilal, M., & Altuwaijri, H. A. (2025). Enhancing Accessibility in Public Spaces: A Computational Study of Hatirjheel Lakefront Using Space Syntax. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14010029

Huang, B.X., Chiou, S.C., & Li, W.Y. (2020). Accessibility and Street Network Characteristics of Urban Public Facility Spaces: Equity Research on Parks in Fuzhou City Based on GIS and Space Syntax Model. Sustainability, 12(9), 3618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093618

Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F., & Ramos, R. (2018). Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto. Journal of Urban Design, 23(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1343087

Khan, F. A., & Tabassum, N. (2024). Assessing walkability in Dhaka’s Central Business districts. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 27, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101184

Khan, M. (2014). Study of Open Spaces in the Context of Dhaka City for Sustainable Use: A Syntactic Approach. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(3), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2014.V6.704

Khan, M. W., Hossain, Md. S., & Alam, M. (2023). GIS-Based Analysis to Identify the Distribution and Accessibility of Urban Green Space in Dhaka Metropolitan City, Bangladesh. Journal of Geographic Information System, 15(01), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2023.151003

Long, Y., Qin, J., Wu, Y., & Wang, K. (2023). Analysis of Urban Park Accessibility Based on Space Syntax: Take the Urban Area of Changsha City as an Example. Land, 12(5), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051061

Luo, Y., & Lin, Z. (2023). Spatial Accessibility Analysis and Optimization Simulation of Urban Riverfront Space Based on Space Syntax and POIs: A Case Study of Songxi County, China. Sustainability, 15(20), 14929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014929

Mohamed, A. A., Kronenberg, J., & Łaszkiewicz, E. (2024). Integrating space syntax with field observations to understand the spatial logic of park infrastructure. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 23(6), 2115–2133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2278883

Nawar, N., Sorker, R., Chowdhury, F. J., & Mostafizur Rahman, Md. (2022). Present status and historical changes of urban green space in Dhaka city, Bangladesh: A remote sensing driven approach. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100425

Nilufar, F. (2000). Urban life and use of public space: Study of responsive public open spaces for supporting urban life in Dhaka City. University of Dhaka.

Rahman, M. H. (2022). A study on determining land use/land cover changes in Dhaka over the last 20 years and observing the impact of population growth on land use/land cover using remote sensing. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v34.17812

Rahman, Md., & Nilufar, F. (2024). An investigation into the land use pattern of Dhaka: Identifying activity nodes for a compact city. Spatium, 52, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT240630014R

Roni, N. A., Tanvir, M. R., Tomal, T., & Iqbal, M. M. J. I. (2022). Spatial structure of retail development in planned residential area of Dhanmondi, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Open Access Library Journal, 9(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109088

Swanwick, C. (2009). Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy, 26, S62–S75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025

Tannous, H. O., Major, M. D., & Furlan, R. (2021). Accessibility of green spaces in a metropolitan network using space syntax to objectively evaluate the spatial locations of parks and promenades in Doha, State of Qatar. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126892

Thwaites, K., & Simkins, I. (2006). Experiential landscape. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462096

Valipour, E., Mobaraki, A., Nikoofam, M., & Tayyebisoudkolaei, S. (2019). Establishment of Space syntax to read and analyze urban network; the case of study, Famagusta city of Cyprus. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 3(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4692

Wright Wendel, H. E., Zarger, R. K., & Mihelcic, J. R. (2012). Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003

Yamu, C., van Nes, A., & Garau, C. (2021). Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application. Sustainability, 13(6), 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394

Zhai, Y., Li, D., Wu, C., & Wu, H. (2021). Urban park facility use and intensity of seniors’ physical activity – An examination combining accelerometer and GPS tracking. Landscape and Urban Planning, 205, 103950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103950

Zhang, S., & Zhou, W. (2018). Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits: Evidence from geotagged social media data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.004

Zhang, T., Lian, Z., & Xu, Y. (2020). Combining GPS and space syntax analysis to improve understanding of visitor temporal–spatial behaviour: a case study of the Lion Grove in China. Landscape Research, 45(4), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2020.1730775

Downloads

Published

2025-09-04

How to Cite

Mouri, F. M., Wasi, A. A., & Nilufar, F. (2025). From Connectivity to Liveability: Enhancing Urban Waterbody Accessibility through Space Syntax in Dhaka. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 9(2), 368-386. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2025.v9n2-3

Plaudit