Influence of Urban Street Vending on Pedestrian Experience and Behaviour: A Systematic Quantitative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n1-10Keywords:
Urban Street Vending, Pedestrian Experience, Pedestrian Behaviour, Systematic Quantitative ReviewAbstract
Urban street vending is an integral part of everyday public life and can contribute to vibrant and lively streets. Yet, few cities formally integrate this activity into public space design. This is because street vending is a highly contested, although transformative phenomenon that has complex inter-relationships with other urban entities. This paper systematically and quantitatively assesses the breadth and depth of academic literature that studied such a relationship; more specifically, the influence of street vending on pedestrians' experiences and behaviours and thereby identifies gaps in the existing literature. A systematic review of 25 peer-reviewed journal articles is undertaken to provide an assessment of the geographic extent, disciplinary scope, timeline of publications, keywords, methods, theories, constructs and concepts. This review concludes that the existing research is emerging, but rapidly accelerating and cross-disciplinary. Although the research was predominantly conducted in the Global South, it is largely affiliated with the Global North with limited North-South partnerships. The literature is largely qualitative, indicating a propensity for skewed perspectives. It also lacks theoretical applications exclusive to pedestrian-vendor relationships. Finally, potential areas where future researchers may expand and influence the knowledge domain are identified. This includes developing multi-contextual global perspectives through North-South partnerships and combining or independently applying grounded theory, mixed methods and case study research to broaden theoretical and empirical bases.
Downloads
References
Acuto, M., & Curtis, S. (Eds.) (2013). Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969
Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612449261
Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., Alvarez, V., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Urban walkability considering pedestrians’ perceptions of the built environment: a 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Walkability and Its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218
Basu, N., Haque, M. M., King, M., Kamruzzaman, M., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2022). A systematic review of the factors associated with pedestrian route choice. Transport Reviews, 42(5), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2000064
Bhowmik, S. K. (2005). Street Vendors in Asia: A Review. Economic and Political Weekly, 20(22-23), 2256-2264.
Binka, F. (2005). Editorial: North-South research collaborations: A move towards a true partnership? In Tropical Medicine and International Health, 10 (3), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01373.x
Blečić, I., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., & Trunfio, G. A. (2020). Planning and design support tools for walkability: A guide for Urban analysts. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114405
Bonaccorsi, G., Manzi, F., Del Riccio, M., Setola, N., Naldi, E., Milani, C., Giorgetti, D., Dellisanti, C., & Lorini, C. (2020). Impact of the built environment and the neighborhood in promoting the physical activity and the healthy aging in older people: An umbrella review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17( 17), (1–27). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176127
Bradley, M. (2008). On the agenda: North - South research partnerships and agenda-setting processes. Development in Practice, 18(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802386314
Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., & Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568717
Bromley, R. (2000). Street Vending and ublic Policy: A Global Review 1. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(1/2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789052
Carmona, M. (2015). Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism, 8(4), 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518
Chankseliani, M. (2023). Who funds the production of globally visible research in the Global South? Scientometrics, 128(1), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04583-4
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Closa, C. (2021). Planning, implementing and reporting: increasing transparency, replicability and credibility in qualitative political science research. European Political Science, 20(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00299-2
Confraria, H., Mira Godinho, M., & Wang, L. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy, 46(1), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.004
Cook, L. D., & Kamalodeen, V. J. (2020). Combining Mixed Methods and Case Study Research (MM+CSR) to Give Mixed Methods Case Study Designs. Caribbean Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 47–76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351102015
Cooper, K., Breakey, H., Lewis, M., Marshallsay, R., Naraniecki, A., & Sampford, C. (2023). Aquaculture ethics: A systematic quantitative review and critical analysis of aquaculture ethics scholarship. Fish and Fisheries, 24(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12729
Creamer, E. G. (2018). Enlarging the Conceptualization of Mixed Method Approaches to Grounded Theory with Intervention Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772642
Cresswell, John W. (2022). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research, 2nd Edition. Sage Publications.
Dadpour, S., Pakzad, J., & Khankeh, H. (2016). Understanding the influence of environment on adults’walking experiences: A meta-synthesis study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13( 7), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070731
De Vos, J., Lättman, K., van der Vlugt, A. L., Welsch, J., & Otsuka, N. (2023). Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: a literature review, conceptual model and research agenda. Transport Reviews, 43(2), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2101072
Deore, P., & Lathia, S. (2019). Streets as public spaces: Lessons from street vending in Ahmedabad, India. Urban Planning, 4(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2058
Devlin, R. T. (2019). A focus on needs: toward a more nuanced understanding of inequality and urban informality in the global North. Journal of Cultural Geography, 36(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2018.1531474
Dovey, K. (2011). Uprooting critical urbanism. City, 15(3–4), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595109
Dovey, K., Rao, F., & Pafka, E. (2018). Agglomeration and assemblage: Deterritorialising urban theory. Urban Studies, 55(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017711650
Dovey, K., Recio, R. B., & Pafka, E. (2022). The spatial logic of informal street vending in Manila: an assemblage approach. Space and Polity, 26(3) 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2022.2153224
Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962
Dragović, D., Krklješ, M., Slavković, B., Aleksić, J., Radaković, A., Zećirović, L., Alcan, M., & Hasanbegović, E. (2023). A Literature Review of Parameter-Based Models for Walkability Evaluation. Applied Sciences,13 (7), 4408. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074408
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866
Elzeni, M. M., ELMokadem, A. A., & Badawy, N. M. (2022). Impact of urban morphology on pedestrians: A review of urban approaches. Cities, 129, 103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103840
Farías, I. (2011). The politics of urban assemblages. City, 15(3–4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595110
Feng, Y., Duives, D., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2021). Data collection methods for studying pedestrian behaviour: A systematic review. Building and Environment, 187, 107329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107329
Fernandez, W. D., & Lehmann, H. (2011). Case Studies And Grounded Theory Method In Information Systems Research: Issues And Use. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 13(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2011.10856199
Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P. J. G., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., & Ramos, R. A. R. (2022). Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. In International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16 (7), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793
Gaillard, J. F. (1994). North-South Research Partnership: Is Collaboration Possible between Unequal Partners ?.Knowledge and Policy, 7, 31-63 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692761
Greene, J. C. (2005). The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 28(2), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500256293
Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural ResearchMethods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Guetterman, T. C., Babchuk, W. A., Smith, M. C. H., & Stevens, J. (2017). Contemporary Approaches to Mixed Methods Grounded Theory. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817710877
Guitart, D., Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2012). Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11 (4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
Hagos, K. G., Adnan, M., & Yasar, A. ul H. (2020). Effect of sidewalk vendors on pedestrian movement characteristics: A microscopic simulation study of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Cities, 103, 102769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102769
Hassen, N., & Kaufman, P. (2016). Examining the role of urban street design in enhancing community engagement: A literature review. In Health and Place, 41, 119–132. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.005
Herrmann-Lunecke, M. G., Mora, R., & Sagaris, L. (2020). Persistence of walking in Chile: lessons for urban sustainability. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1712494
Huang, M. H., & Huang, M. J. (2018). An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 115(2), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2677-y
Iroz-Elardo, N., Adkins, A., & Ingram, M. (2021). Measuring perceptions of social environments for walking: A scoping review of walkability surveys. Health and Place, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102468
Jamei, E., Ahmadi, K., Chau, H. W., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., & Stojcevski, A. (2021). Urban design and walkability: Lessons learnt from Iranian traditional cities. Sustainability, 13(10), 5731.. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105731
Jamme, H.-T. (2023). Productive Frictions. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2155687
Jeffery, R. (2014). Authorship in multi-disciplinary, multi-national North-South research projects: Issues of equity, capacity and accountability. Compare, 44(2), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.829300
Kamalipour, H., & Peimani, N. (2015). Assemblage Thinking and the City: Implications for Urban Studies. Current Urban Studies, 03(04), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2015.34031
Keswani, K. (2019). The logic of design: its role in understanding the antecedents of urban informality. Journal of Urban Design, 24(4), 656–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1479960
Kim, E., & Cuskelly, G. (2017). A systematic quantitative review of volunteer management in events. Event Management, 21(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599517X14809630271195
Klann, A., Vu, L., Ewing, M., Fenton, M., & Pojednic, R. (2019). Translating urban walkability initiatives for older adults in rural and under-resourced communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, (17), 3041.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173041
Kumar, R. (2014) Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications Ltd., London.
Laird-Gentle, A., Larkin, K., Kanasa, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2023). Systematic quantitative literature review of the dialogic pedagogy literature. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 46, 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00029-9
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Lee, H., Morrison, C., Doriean, N. J. C., Welsh, D. T., & Bennett, W. W. (2022). Metals in coastal seagrass habitats: A systematic quantitative literature review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 53(17), 1568-1585.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2164154
Lehmann, H. (2010). Research Method: Grounded Theory for Descriptive and Exploratory Case Studies. In H. Lehmann (Ed.), The Dynamics of International Information Systems: Anatomy of a Grounded Theory Investigation (pp. 53–65). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5750-4_5
Mahmoudi, S., Huda, N., Alavi, Z., Islam, M. T., & Behnia, M. (2019). End-of-life photovoltaic modules: A systematic quantitative literature review. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.018
Martellotta, E. F., Brumm, A., & Langley, M. C. (2022). Tales of Multifunctionality: a Systematic Quantitative Literature Review of Boomerangs Used as Retouchers in Australian Aboriginal Cultures. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 30, 310-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09561-x
Martin, N. (2014). Food fight! Immigrant Street Vendors, Gourmet Food Trucks and the Differential Valuation of Creative Producers in Chicago. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1867–1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12169
McFarlane, C., & Anderson, B. (2011). Thinking with Assemblage. Area, 43(2), 162–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01012.x
Milani, M. K., & Hashemi, M. R. (2020). Extended grounded theory: a methodology to combine multiple disciplines. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 18(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-020-00464-6
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
Morales, A. (2000). Peddling Policy: Street Vending in Historical and Contemporary Context. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(3/4), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789133
Najafi, P., Mohammadi, M., Le Blanc, P. M., & van Wesemael, P. (2022). Insights into placemaking, senior people, and digital technology: a systematic quantitative review. Journal of Urbanism, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2076721
Nasrollahi, N., Ghosouri, A., Khodakarami, J., & Taleghani, M. (2020). Heat-mitigation strategies to improve pedestrian thermal comfort in urban environments: A review. Sustainability,12 (23), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310000
Newman, L. L., & Burnett, K. (2013). Street food and vibrant urban spaces: Lessons from Portland, Oregon. Local Environment, 18(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.729572
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Parker, J., & de Baro, M. E. Z. (2019). Green infrastructure in the urban environment: A systematic quantitative review. Sustainability 11 (11), 3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182
Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2022a). Informal Street Vending: A Systematic Review. Land, 11(6), 829.. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060829
Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2022b). Mapping the Spatiality of Informal Street Vending. Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, (1-20) https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2150267
Piazzoni, F. (2022). Material agencies of survival: Street vending on a Roman bridge. Cities, 123, 13412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103412
Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
Pickering, C., Grignon, J., Steven, R., Guitart, D., & Byrne, J. (2014). Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1756–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914907
Pickering, C., Johnson, M., & Byrne, J. (2021). Using Systematic Quantitative Literature Reviews for Urban Analysis. In S. Baum (Ed.), Methods in Urban Analysis (pp. 29–49). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_3
Recchi, S. (2020). Informal street vending: A comparative literature review. In International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(7–8), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0285
Reidpath, D. D., & Allotey, P. (2019). The problem of ‘trickle-down science’ from the Global North to the Global South. In BMJ Global Health,4 (4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001719
Ren, J., & Luger, J. (2015). Comparative urbanism and the “Asian City”: Implications for research and theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12140
Robinson, J. (2016). Comparative Urbanism: New Geographies and Cultures of Theorizing the Urban. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12273
Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,11 (4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
Salvo, G., Lashewicz, B. M., Doyle-Baker, P. K., & McCormack, G. R. (2018). Neighbourhood built environment influences on physical activity among adults: A systematized review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050897
Shen, W., Xu, X., & Wang, X. (2022). Reconceptualising international academic mobility in the global knowledge system: towards a new research agenda. Higher Education, 84(6), 1317–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00931-8
Shields, R., Gomes da Silva, E. J., Lima e Lima, T., & Osorio, N. (2023). Walkability: a review of trends. Journal of Urbanism, 16(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1936601
Smeby, J. C., & Trondal, J. (2005). Globalisation or europeanisation? International contact among university staff. In Higher Education, 49 (4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2826-5
Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., MacMillan, A., Field, A., Baas, P., & Mackie, H. (2017). Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport - an update and new findings on health equity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
Steven, R., Pickering, C., & Guy Castley, J. (2011). A review of the impacts of nature based recreation on birds. In Journal of Environmental Management, 92 (10), 2287–2294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.005
Sun, Z. (2021). A rhythmanalysis approach to understanding the vending-walking forms and everyday use of urban street space in Yuncheng China. Urban Studies, 59(5), 1–16.
Sun, Z., Bell, S., Scott, I., & Qian, J. (2020). Everyday use of urban street spaces: the spatio-temporal relations between pedestrians and street vendors: a case study in Yuncheng, China. Landscape Research, 45(3), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2019.1646231
Sun, Z., Scott, I., Bell, S., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2021). Time distances to residential food amenities and daily walking duration: A cross-sectional study in two low tier chinese cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020839
Tafti, M. T. (2019). Assembling Street Vending. Urban Studies, 57(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019856864
Takata, K., & Hallmann, K. (2021). A systematic quantitative review of authenticity in sport tourism. Journal of Sport and Tourism, 25(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2021.1877564
Taufen, A., Hoffman, L. M., & Yocom, K. P. (2022). Assemblage as heuristic: unveiling infrastructures of port city waterfronts. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2055631
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2012). Common ‘Core’ Characteristics of Mixed Methods Research: A Review of Critical Issues and Call for Greater Convergence. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433795
The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, Pub. L. No. 7, The Gazette of India Extraordinary 1 (2014).
Thomson, A., Cuskelly, G., Toohey, K., Kennelly, M., Burton, P., & Fredline, L. (2019). Sport event legacy: A systematic quantitative review of literature. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.011
Tonnelat, S. (2007). Keeping space public: Times Square (New York) and the Senegalese peddlers. CyberGeo, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.4792
Uddin, M. A. (2021). Street vending: exploring an excluded economic sector in Chittagong city, Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 31(3), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1845613
Vichiensan, V., & Nakamura, K. (2021). Walkability perception in asian cities: A comparative study in bangkok and nagoya. Sustainability, 13(12), 6825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126825
Wachsmuth, D., Madden, D. J., & Brenner, N. (2011). Between abstraction and complexity. City, 15(6), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.632903
Walsh, I. (2015). Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: An enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 531–557. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.23
Walton, R. E. (1972). Advantages and Attributes of the Case Study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 8(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637200800106
Wang, H., & Yang, Y. (2019). Neighbourhood walkability: A review and bibliometric analysis. Cities, 93, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
Westenhöfer, J., Nouri, E., Reschke, M. L., Seebach, F., & Buchcik, J. (2023). Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA). BMC Public Health, 23(1), 518. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4
Wongtada, N. (2014). Street vending phenomena: A literature review and research agenda. Thunderbird International Business Review, 56(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21596
Yadollahi, S. (2017). Prospects of Applying Assemblage Thinking for Further Methodological Developments in Urban Conservation Planning. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 8(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2017.1399977
Yatmo, Y. A. (2009). Perception of street vendors as ‘out of place’ urban elements at day time and night time. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.001
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yun, H. Y. (2019). Environmental Factors Associated with Older Adult’s Walking Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Sustainability, 11(12), 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123253
Zamani, B., & Babaei, E. (2021). A Critical Review of Grounded Theory Research in Urban Planning and Design. Planning Practice & Research, 36(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1830240
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Assist. Prof. Amala Anna Jacob
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
