The effect of the binary space and social interaction in creating an actual context of understanding the traditional urban space

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3672

Keywords:

Urban Space, Traditional city, Prototypes, Context, Synchronic, Diachronic

Abstract

Urban Space is not just a simple, physical configuration. Instead, it is a transformation of human experiences with the different synchronic architectural characteristic that needs a critical examination to segregate discrete layers of structural elements. As a result, the traditional urban space is a unique existence of reality; it is a product of prolonged interaction between society and architecture. Neglecting any part in the public space perception process is leading to crash the binary equation letting the meaning paralyzed without being able to represent any society or potentially keep the sense. There are many examples of worn-out urban spaces some of them was a result of ignorance and absent of realization of the interaction between Society and architecture.The Iraqi municipality demolished that relationship by importing different layers that are not compatible with the original one or as a result of inserting new means of technology in the heart of the historic cities. The other example from Erbil, a city north of Iraq, where the municipality determinable removed the old fabric to insert a well-defined rectangle space, somehow to create an urban public space, that procedure juxtaposed by form a barrier to isolate the old Souk from the other part of the old city. Both cities suffered from a misunderstanding of the urban binary equation between space and architecture as a tool to understand the context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Metrics

References

Amen, M. A. (2017, August). The inspiration of Bauhaus principles on the modern housing in Cyprus. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 1(2), p. 21-32. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2017.3645

HIillier, B., & Hanson, J. (2009). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press.

Lawson, B. (2001). The Language of Space. Architectural Press.

Leach, N. (1997). Rethinking Architecture. Routledge.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of The City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Mallgrave , H. F., & Goodman, D. (2011). An Introduction to Architectural Theory 1968 to the Present. Wiley-Blackwel.

Massey, D. (2008). Doreen Massey: For Space. SAGE Publications Ltd.

NIA, H. A., & SULEIMAN, Y. H. (2017, August). Identity in Changing Context: Factors of losing Identity in new developed part of the city of Famagusta, North Cyprus. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs., 1(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3661

Samuels, I. (2004). Urban forms the death and life of the urban block. Architectural Press.

Schulz, C. N. (1991). Genius Loci: Toward a phenomenological view in Architecture. Rizzoli.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: a user-friendly guide. New York: Routledge.

Unwin, S. (1909). Town Planning in Practice: An Introduction to the Art of Designing Cities and Suburbs. New York: Charles Scribner & Sons. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/11624231

Williams, J. (2010). Understanding post-structuralism. New York: Acumen.

Winters, E. (2007). Aesthetics and Architecture. Continuum International Group. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

Amen, M. A., & Kuzovic, D. (2018). The effect of the binary space and social interaction in creating an actual context of understanding the traditional urban space. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3672

Most read articles by the same author(s)